IRC-Galleria

24. November, 2015. These are Nasa's pictures. I haven't changed them in any way. You may not believe this first, but it's so clear, that there is no mistake.



Those are the same as Yorgia-sacks /-chambers on Earth. Their size is kilometres, and the whole asteroid is full of them and so, it is or was full of life. Fetus-sack has two hands holding them, both on Earth and on Vesta, + many other fastening parts were there too, at least on the Earth. Actually a collar-shaped tissue circled the sack all over. That is propably the uterus. Study it, and you'll find it to be true. You'll see same big jaw horn, that is holded/covered by caretaking "hand", you'll see 2 direction of the stripes around the big jaw horn, you'll see big hole up there; "hand" covers it too. I'm not sure, if that is the hole to give birth. Under the big horn there is a weird "mouth"-cut. The opposite side has no horns, but a few cut-kind-of structures in smooth round curve, and 2 similar structures meet there in the middle of that side. Trying to say, that the packet has almost exactly the same structure, although it is not simple, but really quite special, I'd say even complicated.
I studied the photo many hours last night, and didn't realise first the similarity - although I had suspected from the very beginning the holes to be those ...
How I found these: 1. Knew Yorgia to be among the oldest on Earth. Saw an unclear photo of a Yorgia-stone, that I could dig into with Photoshop. 2. Checked surfaces of Mars and others. Vesta seemed weird/"unregular" already at the first glance.

The blue photos from Earth are negative-versions of a photo showing Yorgia-fossiles on a stone. Those are very very old.

Work is not done: How flat or plump was the fetus, and what kind of appearance did it have? <-- One can find them and find the answers to those questions.

How many fastening-points the sack had and what kind they were? <-- Answering to that question should not be impossible.

What was really the "thing", to what this roundish part fastened? Foam/mud/jelly with no body but some cords and fibres used the materia, that was in suitable form? Or was that surroundings some jelly-animal's back? Or jelly leaf's back? There should be a connection to a leaf-kind... or is this even older than a plant-shaped...? There are signs of community, that surrounded the sacks, and created the sacks ... community mass, but also leaves and plant-shapes... Really there are huge straight body-trees/ -trunks, that grow smaller branches... one needs to study those with time, instead of mess around with glances and foggy old & new theories. :) Nasa seems to have very good images.

Nautilus resembles these cover-chambers a lot - it came from it, in a way like "not leaving shell & keeping fetus-form"? Insects kept the chamber for birth -system, and kept the baby-form, but refused to fasten back to ground for adult-time? And there are many other questions, too.

Interesting things, those Yorgias. These are negative-pics from Earth. (In positive it's unclear, shining blond light.) Their size was only some 20 cm.


A large lake disappeared into a hole in Oregon, USA, on the first days of last May. It seemed to me, that the chamber of some 1-2 metres had been one of THOSE. There were that kind of structures on the bottom of the hole. I don't know how old the mud or mud-jelly or stoned mud-foam was round the hole, but it should have had "mother-tissue", protecting flap like a plant's part (closing the biggest openings), and several veins to the chamber.
If it was a chamber of those creatures in Oregon, the next question is: why/how can the remains suck a large lake? Where did the water go? Where the water went, some kind of roots may have had a connection to there.(I cannot know, what kind of hollow places there are down there and why ... I'd not want to dig that deep to that :) ... but Jamal in Russia comes to mind.



_______________________________________________________

P.S. It may be nothing, but marks of vulcanism. Hot water & lava spitted out? Will I ever learn. This was stupid.






Or maybe all that are marks of vulcanism? I thought that up from the "flower-circled hole" came a leaf ... ... well, anyway, weird ghosts there are. At least I noticed the ghosts. Human eye doesn't see those easily.

P.S. About the different shapes of the leaves: Look what crawled on Nemiana on our planet: they were tiny, transparent, AND, shapes altered really lot, from narrow to wide and from thin to thick. I've seen same kind of multi-form crawlers in some Mars-photo.
I'm not really sure how it goes... those pink roots seem to end to female-leaves. And... male leaves' root isn't that massive, but much smaller grabbing hand? It's all there, written on the sea-bottom, the data and the answers.

Upper and lower pictures are the same photo. You can add contrast by pushing your laptop's screen backwards, and so can see much better details. Plus clik the picture. Female-leaves are easy to see, but the males that I marked with green, orange (and light-blue), you may have difficulties, because picture is small (I hunted them from bigger version), and remains of thin male-leaves are faint. But they are there, for sure. It's piece of cake in the future, but until now it has been just a cake.


"roots crab"... I meant grab.
I have watched for 15 months these surfaces of the Earth and of Mars, looking for early life and early life's nature. One cannot do that without learning anything.
If the slimmer leaves are not males, then the thin threads, that are sunk into the "foam", are males(?) Or both. Or there's some thread-alike parasite, moving straight and leaving eggs or such behind. Similar being would leave black, spotted strings on the white leaves in the white, so called mollusc photo - and doesn't seem to be part of the white small leaves. Or is it?

_______________________________________________________

Digging the mystery of the mollusc-looking "Sleeping Beauty" (in Mars).
Don't ask me, how a tea-pot (or sponge) looking thing can be the same, as ... hmmm ... They are not the same species! They have same color, because they all are covered all over by transparent leaves (which make also black threads + dark holes. In the white photo, there may be more than one, maybe even 3 large visible species + more than one transparent leaf-species. Complicated tea-pot cannot be the same thing, as the giant "generations-missile".
Then, the cute plump disc looking one, that sleeps in crescent-chamber and has stalk/stem ... may be part of the teapot, or may be different. May even not have a stalk. Truth cannot be hard to find. I wonder, if "the missile" could be just volcanic, non-living...



________________________________________________________
This requires concentration. Sorry for small pics, dimness, text-flood with small font ...

__________________________________________________

The black & white creatures are quite a mystery. Look like molluscs. Sleep inside half-moon foam. Lay on a white shoe-bottom! Have row of holes. On that there's brown worm ... that grows "trees"... which are possibly some "mold"-fungi. And, the creatures are covered all over by white leaves ( - that are visible, 3D, clear, ...)
ORIGINAL NASA MATERIAL. I HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING TO IT.



They are not balloons. They are leaves.
There are more leaves in the picture. I didn't mark all. I'll put more leaf-pictures. Leaves have been propably transparent. One big thick leaf, like a statue, massive from root, rises up down there, down+middle. I didn't mark that either. There are (were, may be that they still are there) ~2 such, with massive root, standing in front of others. This is ghostbusting ...

I think that there's "chamber"-thing, that is involved with leaves... (thick charnias) ( - me and my theories). Then there are also sponge-community-chambers ...! Which was first, charnia or sponge ?!

(Actually thought: "A leaf makes a round chamber, leaf transfers its materia to the fetus (because looks so very thin, when dies). White, a little plump fetus comes out, swims kilometres or dozens of kilometres, settles on the sea bottom, and the circle starts again from the beginning." I followed dusty tracks, dozens of kilometres - it would not be a long swimming distance for a very big creature, that is made for swimming - and thought that found a white leaf-like thing there, where tracks ended. But I'm not quite sure about that, if that has happened or not. :) I don't mind about that, how cold or how out of water the surface of the asteroid is (now), nor about the huge sizes.
Have to add to "the fairytale" that empty round chamber seems to have prints of 2 halfs, on/in the hole's bottom. There have been twins. Life needs multi-copying.)

I will add more pictures. The picture shown below is really full of life-signs.
There are many faint remains of thin leaves. (Maybe the brown leaf was red once? Or greenish when lived?) I HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING TO THE PHOTO. ORIGINAL NASA-STUFF.
(My daughter asked, what the stripes in the "worm's hole" are. I cried: Hell! The leaves have each 2 roots! )

I haven't checked "the green rooster-heads" of England from street point of view... trees can make weird forms, too. Anyway, such discs have existed and still exist.

(Or that's what it SEEMS to be ... it does not seem to be old. I don't know, how a river could look like that. Hmm... the bottom could have had an elastic cover, that turned upside down at some points... that would explain ... the white living thing increased and turned the bottom-clay upside down? But it still look wormy-kind, there are heads and tails ... )

(Aika erikoiset nuo Solomonin saaret muiltakin paikannimiltään ... - tuo nimilista ei ole Solomonin saarten läheltäkään.)

Ote nimeltä "Uponnut Tynnyri". Kuukausien kehityksen tulos. Mahdollisimman väljä ja ilmava ote, pikkurilli tynnyrin pohjana. Katso nenä viuhuaa tarkistamassa, että onko sijainti dramaattisesti muuttunut liikkeen myötä. Jokainen tuon lajin edustaja ei ole yhtä rauhallinen ja välinpitämätön muhjake: voi olla niin arasteleva tai villi ja vapaa, ettei suostu olemaan kädessä eikä selällään. Eikä tuokaan olisi välttämättä suostunut olemaan tuossa, ellei olisi ollut niin uninen.

(Niillä on niin hyvä hajuaisti, että kun metallinen tarjotin, kromattu tms elohopeisen loistava pinnaltaan, jonka päällä tietää iskeytyneensä omistajan voileipiin, on ollut minuutti sitten sängyn päällä, mutta ei ole enää, niin siinä kohdassa juoksu loppuu kuin seinään. Ehkä olin koskettanut tarjottimen pohjaa tai reunaa. Tai se haistoi pelkän metallin. Silloin ajattelin, että se haistoi metallin. Ehkä se ei ollutkaan aivan niin huikea juttu. Tai... tarjottimen pohjaan on saattanut tarttua pöytäliinasta hyvin kevyitä leipähiukkasia muutamia hitusia ...)
(Se haistaa heti myös itikan, ja tietää, että mitä sille pitää tehdä, vaikka ei olisi koskaan itikkaa tavannut: pitää napata nopeasti hyökkäämällä! :) No ei se ole ihme, jos itikan haistaa. Pakkohan senkin on jollekin haista, vaikka ei ihmisen maailmassa niin tekisikään. Tarkoitan, että se haistaa itikan jos sen laittaa nenän eteen. Ei sentään kaukaa. :D Mutta koska se tiesi heti mikä liikkumatonkin itikka on - 'herkku-syötävä' - niin haistamallahan se sen tiesi.)

Tämä oli ensimmäinen kahdesta hamsteristani.
Ehkä joku ajattelee, että mitä nämä ovat nämä tekstit, että onko siinä jotain piiloviestiä... No ei ole. :D

KATSO ALAPUOLELLA OLEVA TEKSTI !

Tämä kuva Marsista: "Lisää vain vesi" ! Ohoh!! Nyt huomaan, että se, mitä on alhaalla pienemmässä koossa (mustat lehdet ovat reunustaneet sivuilta matalaa kuoppaa, jonka pohjan alla makaa kuin lasin alla "vaalea lehti"), on ylempänä isommassa koossa. ====> Molemmissa painauma-asetelmissa on oikeassa alareunassa pieni "kupla-kuoppa", jonka sisällä on jokin johtomainen juuri. <==== Nykyisillä "tiedoillani" kysymyksessä on kuopat, joissa kypsyi lehden muotoinen sikiö kuvun alla. Mielestäni sellaisia isoja on ollut muillakin taivaankappaleilla. Jos on jäljellä tyhjä muotti, jota ympäröi "länget", ja jonka pohjalla on vain lehteä muistuttava kuva, niin päättelin, että se on lähtenyt kuopasta. En tiedä, onko näissä painaumissa se lehti yhä siinä paikallaan kuopan pohjalla, näyttää toisaalta, kuin olisi. Mittakaavaa en tiedä. Sama juttu kuin Marsin "Sleeping Beauty" -mustavalkoisten kiekkojen kohdalla: saattavat olla isojakin.



En voi jatkaa nyt moneen kuukauteen kunnolla niitä planeetta- ja kivitutkimuksiani, koska 14 vuotta vanha Photoshop on kotona, mutta minä en - vaan onhan maailma täynnä näitäkin kuvia, joita ei tarvitse muokata. (Taannoin näytin youtubesta löytämäni vedestä samaan suuntaan kurkistavat kivikärsät rannalla.) Tässä alla on vajaa puolet alkuperäisestä kuvasta.


"Vinoperäinen kivi": Marsissa on sellaisia(kin), entisten järvien rannoilla. Kuutiomainen suorakaide, jonka perä on viisto. Ajattelin että sellainen voisi olla jokin tiivis/painava nilviäismäinen eläin, joka on kivettynyt paikoilleen sen kummemmin mätänemättä (niinkuin kaikki ympärillään). Tiedäpä niistä!


________________________________________________________




ja Kekkosen haamu haistaisi sen kankaan toiselta puolelta ... vaikka kuva ei olisikaan keskellä housujen takamusta.

(Minä en muuten nukkunut viime yönä täysiä yöunia. Pitäisi olla ostamassa seinämaalia, eikä laatimassa tällaisia kuvia.)

_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________

.
.


(On kyllä vähän karmea, riukelon vieressä oleva "käsi" ... En muista, että missä näin tuollaisen. Minusta tuntuu, että näin tuollaisen - muuallakin kuin jossain kauhuelokuvassa. No ei se nyt ihan karmea ole... olkoon muistutus ihmisen omasta "inhottavuudesta". Tai olkoon mikä tahansa. Jokin se on... juurakko tai saalistusväline. En usko, että tuokaan mikään sattuman savivalos olisi. Jos näet 3 tai 4 nätissä rivissä, niin alarm: iso mahdollisuus on sen olla elävän olennon osia.)